1.3 French East India Company

French East India Company

2020-04-27 14:55:09


  • 1664 : During the reign of Louis XIV minister Colbert estd FEIC w/ 50 years monopoly to trade in Indian and Pacfic Ocean
  • 1667 : Francois Caron expedition to India estd a factory in Surat.
  • 1669 : Mercara founded another factory at Masulipatnam
  • 1673 : permission from Shaista Khan (Bengal) to estd township Chandernagore
  • 1673 : Sher Khan Lodi gov of Valikondapuram (Bijapur) granted Francois Martin land thus Pondicherry was founded in 1674

French-East-India-Company-image1-23544691.gif

Administrative Limitation of FEIC

  • #todo
  • Inferior system of Governance in France which was despotic where everything depended on the personality of the Monarch
  • Lack of a democratic constitutional set up further limited the scope of imaginative means to improve inefficiencies of the govt/administration
**Alfred Lyall** : India was lost due to the short sighted, ill managed European policy of Louis XV misguided by his mistressess and incompetent ministers.
  • FEIC was a dept of the state w/ most of the capital subscribed by the Monarch. Directors were nominated by the King, who were under 2 High Commissioners.
  • State guaranteed return to shareholders not the FEIC -> led to administrative indifference
  • Company frequently borrowed capital and sold trading rights in lieu to annual sums of money. Coy was also heavily subsidised
  • English superiority on the seas
collapse: open

**Alfred Lyall** :  2 primary conditions of success in India was estd of strong points of support in the coast and maintenance of naval force to keep communications open.

  • Bussy and Lally looked down upon their subordinates alienating their compatriots
  • Continental Policy followed by France got her involved in wars near her home that disallowed them to send colonies abroad.
  • French had only one seat of power that was Pondicherry. British had many.

Economic Limitation of FEIC

  • #todo
  • 1769 : was abolished by Louis XVI. He agreed to pay FEIC's debt and obligations all its properties were transferred to the state
  • 1785 : Reconstituted its monopoly was abolished in 1790 due to French Revolution. It was liquidated in 1794 when FEIC failed to bribe ministers to carry out its own liquidation
  • The Carnatic wars (1740-63), Austrian war of Succession (1740-48), Seven Years war(1756-63) and French participation in the American War of Independence(1765-83 ) stretched finances.
  • Simultaneous expansion in colonies and continent . This divided its scarce resource.
  • The aristocrats and French Nobility were corrupt and spent way too much in debauchery and unecessary lavishness. French Revolution was final nail in the coffin
  • Administrative Limitation meant that they could not strengthen their foothold in India -> Lower economic remuneration from Indian colonies
  • Losses in War had them further lose influence on native rulers and grant of territory dec and thus their revenue.
  • Financial Losses apparent esp in 2nd and 3rd Carnatic war ex Bussy's recall because of it, unpaid soldiers.
  • Bussy was indifferent towards financial losses, his lack of imagination or innovation to counter financial problems at a time when EIC was gaining so much from its India trade
    • State guaranteed return to shareholders not the FEIC -> led to administrative indifference

    • Company frequently borrowed capital and sold trading rights in lieu to annual sums of money. Coy was also heavily subsidised